by Debra Kaufman
After years of hopeful talk about the "convergence" of
film and video, the digital-intermediate (DI) process is bringing
filmmakers closer to that dream than ever before. Proponents
of the process argue that it offers significantly greater control
over the look of the final image. "You're manipulating much
more than color values," notes Peter Mavromates,
postproduction supervisor on Confessions of a Dangerous Mind,
which was digitally graded at Technique. "Dangerous Mind has
a few different looks, and some are quite extreme. To accomplish
it in the lab wouldn't have been possible. With a digital intermediate,
you can combine many different elements to come up with a unique
look."
Dangerous Mind cinematographer Newton Thomas Sigel, ASC concurs: "The
digital intermediate is a tremendous opportunity to have yet
more control [over the image]. You're continuing the process
of cinematography when you color-correct your film, and you can
have an impact almost as great as when
you did your original photography. With contrast, power windows,
recomposing and primary or secondary color correction, you can
really reshoot your film in post."
Another enthusiast is director of photography Rodrigo Prieto, ASC, AMC, who put the ASC Award-nominated Frida through a DI at EFilm. "Ninety
percent of Frida didn't need digital correction, but some of
the looks [director] Julie [Taymor]
wanted would've been very difficult to achieve photochemically," he
says. "In addition, the film spans so many years, so many
places and so many events that I thought we needed a way to control
it all, to give it a unity but also differentiate the particular
looks."
Although fewer than 30 motion pictures have been put through
a DI in their entirety, the buzz over the process is steadily
increasing. Says EFilm president Joe Matza, "The marketplace is beginning to accept this
as a viable tool, certainly creatively." In Europe,
the DI process has been implemented to a much greater degree.
For example, Digital Film Lab in London did its first complete
DI in 1998, on the Swedish feature Zingo,
and has since completed 41 features and 30 shorts, according
to CEO and former cinematographer Kris Kolodziejski.
Factors that have made Hollywood reluctant to fully embrace
digital mastering are both technological and financial. For the
facilities that provide the services, the risks are very high. "The
biggest challenges were, are and will continue to be the large
capital expenditures required to get into this rapidly changing
technical area," says Larry Birstock,
executive vice president of Post Logic Studios.
The first step in the DI process is to scan or transfer film
into the digital realm. Doing that at high-enough resolution
and with enough color information to make digital grading a possibility
has been a consistent challenge. Another is the time-expense
ratio; because high-resolution scanning has historically been
very time-consuming, it was long reserved for short visual-effects
sequences. The introduction of the Spirit DataCine,
a joint project of Eastman Kodak and Philips, was a huge step
forward. Indeed, the Spirit was used to scan some of the first
features that were digitally graded, including Pleasantville (see AC Nov.
'98) and O Brother, Where Art Thou? (AC Oct. '00),
both of which were finished at Cinesite.
With 200 units installed worldwide, the Spirit is one of the
most ubiquitous scanners used for digital grading. One popular
configuration involves use of the Philips Spectre Virtual DataCine (VDC), in use at Cinesite,
Technique and France's Éclair
Labs. "Using the VDC means you don't have to rock 'n' roll
the negative to redo a scene," explains Randy Starr, Cinesite's vice
president of business development. "It's a disk-to-disk
color corrector. The VDC allows us to do a 'best light' scan
of the negative once and then give it back to the production
company. It also has software that allows us to do optical effects
such as fades and dissolves, and digital conforming." Adds
Technique senior digital-film colorist Stephan Nakamura, "We
use the Spectre to move the data around
in color correction. It's like a 2K-resolution digital
disk recorder."
Another solution is the Cintel C-Reality,
which can be found at Post Logic Studios and iO Film. IO Film, which provides digital intermediates
using its customized Cinema-HD Color Transformation Process,
relies on another facility, HTV, to provide the scanning on a
C-Reality.
But many disagree about whether the transfer provided by the
HD-resolution Spirit and C-Reality is sufficient for a DI, in
terms of both picture resolution and colorspace.
Critics point out that the output of an HD scanner - at 1920x1028
pixels - isn't true 2K. "A lot of people who have scanned
on the Spirit and tried to do some compositing afterward have
found themselves in a bit of trouble," notes Colin Ritchie,
a former 5D executive who recently formed the industry consulting
firm Armadillo. "They've had to do some restabilizing because
it's not pin-registered. You have to do some second-guessing
if it comes off the Spirit."
The Imagica Imager XE is the scanner
of choice for many offering DI services, but the trade-off is
speed. Capable of processing 2K scans in 4 seconds per frame
and 4K scans in 8 seconds per frame, the Imagica Imager
XE also provides 10-bit full RGB colorspace,
precision pin-registered movement and proprietary film-gate transport,
with a film-reel capacity of 2,000'. EFilm,
one of the digital-lab pioneers (now owned by Panavision and
Deluxe Labs), uses the Imagica Imager
XE (as well as a proprietary scanner) to scan at 2K resolution
or higher. FotoKem also recently purchased
an Imagica Imager XE.
|