By
1963, the French New Wave wasn't so new anymore, and the
filmmakers who had been celebrated for handheld shots and
unorthodox cuts were looking to expand their style. The liberating
feel of Francois Truffaut's The
400 Blows or Jean-Luc Godard's Breathless was becoming a convention in itself,
and it was up to the most innovative of the bunch to take
the movement to another level.
Though Contempt is
unmistakably a Godard film, it boasts a visual style more commonly associated
with the era's big-budget spectaculars. Starring international
superstar Brigitte Bardot, shot
in widescreen by frequent Godard collaborator
Raul Coutard, and bathed in rich,
primary colors, Contempt often suggests a grand epic
or a Vincente Minnelli musical
rather than New Wave favorites like Breathless or Masculine/Feminine.
In
fact, Contempt, based on an elliptical novel by Alberto
Moravia, concerns the production of an epic film based on
Homer's The Odyssey. Moravia focused primarily on
a frustrated screenwriter's tumultuous relationship with
his inscrutable wife, while Godard,
not surprisingly, seems more excited by the filmmaking process
and its attendant artistic and political ramifications. In
the film, the reluctant screenwriter (Michel Piccoli)
subjugates his creativity to a domineering director (the
brilliantly cast Fritz Lang) who has little regard for the
writer's contribution to the process. The director, in turn,
must put up with the whims of a philistine producer (Jack Palance), whose character can be summed up by his remark, "Whenever
I hear the word 'culture,' I get out my checkbook." Themes
of power and identity reverberate in the screenwriter's relationship
with his wife (Bardot). And all
the while, Godard has fun both
mocking and embracing cinematic convention.
This
Criterion Collection DVD is the first to present Contempt in
its original 2.35:1 aspect ratio. It also offers a number
of interesting extras, including a chapter of interviews
with cinematographer Coutard. It's
also the first chance viewers at home have to see the film's
incredibly rich colors - colors so powerful, Coutard recalls,
that he and Godard initially thought they were far too bold. Forced to
use a particular European print stock for dailies, the two
were bitterly disappointed that the colors seemed washed-out
compared to what they'd intended. But by the time the final
prints were struck on a Kodak stock, they'd become so accustomed
to the look of the workprint that
when the original colors reappeared in all their crisp intensity,
the look "was too vivid," says Coutard. "We'd
gotten used to it the other way. We hated it, but then we
got used to it."
Other
extras include an audio commentary by New York University professor Robert Stam that is often interesting and sometimes wildly speculative;
the material itself seems to deliberately defy such reductive
analysis. A second disc contains several Contempt-related
short films and interviews, some of which were cobbled together
at the time of the film's release, probably for promotional
purposes. The shorts are interesting primarily as a glimpse
of how such a film was publicized in the early Sixties.
A
French-TV interview with Godard at
the time of Contempt's release offers an image of
the auteur decked out in dark suit and shades, seeming more
like a young, shy director eager to peddle his wares than
the full-blown revolutionary he would soon become. The Dinosaur
and the Baby, a loosely structured conversation between Godard and
Lang from 1967, frustratingly focuses more on the nature
of art and the place of cinema in history than on the specifics
of either director's motivation.
The
interviews with Coutard, conducted
recently, offer a fascinating look at the technical challenges
he faced shooting a widescreen color feature on location
in 1963. The very slow stocks, combined with the optical
aberrations of the available lenses, gave the cinematographer
plenty to deal with. He notes that it was terribly difficult
to ensure a level horizon, and that the lenses created problems
galore with their barreling and cushioning. Achieving the
kind of camera movement Godard wanted
was often extremely difficult.
That
said, it's particularly amusing
to hear the esteemed director Lang plays proclaim that the
widescreen format is appropriate "only for snakes and
funerals." Even while pushing Coutard and his crew to the limit to achieve what he wanted, Godard was also deriding
the value of the effect within the film. It's the kind of
self-conscious irony that defies scholarly commentary and
also makes so many of Godard's films
inspiring to watch.
-
Jon Silberg