by Debra Kaufman
Metadata can most simply be defined as "detailed information
about content." Though the term is relatively new, the concept
is as old as film itself. Whether it's Post-it Notes stuck on
film canisters, a cinematographer's diary or scribblings in the
margins of a script, filmmakers have always found ways to convey
information about the artistic intent of the captured images
and sounds.
Nevertheless, this longstanding, informal metadata system has
failed on more than one occasion to preserve the original intent
of the director or cinematographer. Take Fritz Lang's Metropolis.
It's well known that an "Americanized" version of the
film so butchered Lang's original vision that he was moved to
declare that the film no longer existed. At least nine truncated
versions continue to float around the world, only a few of which
were taken from the original film. "Unless there's a major
discovery of film canisters in what was Grandma Lang's attic,
that will probably be the case forever," says David Cunningham
of Snell & Wilcox, a manufacturer of postproduction equipment
and technologies. "Twenty-five percent or more is now thought
to be lost."
Concerns about the abuse of artistic intent persist, and the
ante is about to be upped. The adoption of digital processes
and the advent of a hybrid film-digital workflow have increased
dramatically the need for metadata that reliably conveys - and
preserves - the creative intent of cinematographers. "When
you disconnect the image from a known medium like film and go
into the digital world, you end up with integers in a computer
that mean nothing," explains Jim Sullivan, chief technology
officer of Kodak Entertainment Imaging Services. "They're
just storage locations. They don't carry any interpretation with
them about how [the footage] was captured or is meant to be displayed.
One thing that people learn quickly when they do digital image
processing is that they have to carry definitional data along
with the stored numbers in the computer."
The hybrid film-digital workflow has also changed a familiar
postproduction workflow. Even if they're acquired on film, images
are now handled and manipulated by numerous digital devices that
convert, compress and translate color space, resolution and every
other factor that makes up an image. In a perfect world, metadata
will keep track of what happens to each image at each stage of
the process. In turn, this makes it possible to track changes,
end up with a filmout or digital projection that looks the way
the cinematographer meant it to look, and to archive the finished
product with a permanent record of the artistic intent.
As it stands today, however, the industry is nowhere close to
this goal. "We're at a worse level of interoperability than
we were 15 years ago," says Mark Horton, market development
manager for Quantel. "Now you have so many different acquisition
formats, so many different postproduction possibilities and so
many delivery formats that you don't have the clear baseline
understanding that was previously the case. Digital has opened
up all of these new possibilities, but it has also thrown up
new workflow issues."
Until now, cinematographers have had no voice in determining
the kinds of information that will be contained in metadata,
as standardizing bodies create definitions of metadata based
on feedback from a membership largely composed of engineers,
manufacturers, broadcasters and, to some degree, the motion-picture
studios. If cinematographers' concerns are to be addressed, the
time is now, while the metadata standard is still in the process
of being created.
The ASC Technology Committee is doing just that. Chairman Curtis
Clark, ASC points out that the committee (which includes representatives
from Disney, Paramount, Universal and Warner Bros. studios) is
examining a variety of issues related to digital imaging, from
cameras to the digital-intermediate process, and is working with
both the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE)
and the studio-led Digital Cinema Initiative (DCI) to ensure
that cinematographer's concerns are addressed. Metadata is one
of those issues. "We are playing a role in the development
of metadata," says Clark. "We're critically aware of
the issues. Metadata is a significant part of the much bigger
challenge, which is understanding the management of images within
the hybrid process, and we need to be able to make recommendations
for the best practices."
At its July meeting, the Technology Committee formed a sub-committee
focusing on metadata. This group is headed by Isaac V. Kerlow,
director of digital production and talent in the Corporate New
Technology and Development group of the Walt Disney Company.
Page
1
|