You've
expressed dissatisfaction with Kodak's high-speed Vision stocks
in the past, but we understand that you used the new Vision2
[500T] 5218 for some of this picture. What did you think of
it?
Toll: I'm not a fan of any
of the Vision negative emulsions, especially since the introduction
of Vision print stock. However, when starting a new picture,
I test them all, hoping I've been wrong all along, because I
know Kodak is desperately trying to stop making the EXR stocks,
and is already phasing out EXR [200T] 5293, one of my favorites.
After testing several emulsions for Last Samurai, I decided
to use [EXR 500T] 5298 as a high-speed emulsion and [EXR 100T]
5248 and 5293 as primary stocks. We were shooting in Japan when Kodak introduced 5218. I asked Don Henderson
[at Kodak] for a test roll when we got back to L.A. I thought the test looked
great, so we shot out the 5298 and slowly shifted over to 5218.
It seemed to have great color rendition and a full range of detail
throughout the exposure range without feeling flat, while also
managing to retain good blacks. Those are qualities that the
earlier, slower-speed EXR stocks seemed to have, and I don't
think they've ever been available to this degree in higher-speed
stocks. I'm working on the color-correction of the answer print
now and am eager to see how it looks in the final prints. I understand
that Kodak plans to introduce 100- and 200-ISO versions of 5218.
This could be exciting, but I hope it doesn't mean that they
stop manufacturing the EXR emulsions before cinematographers
have had an adequate amount of time to determine their own preferences.
As we've seen before, the real test of a new emulsion is how
it gets adopted and used by cinematographers, and it would be
tragic if those who believe the EXR stocks to be preferable could
no longer use them.
When
it was decided that Last Samurai would be filmed in
two different hemispheres, how did you organize your crews?
Toll: This was a fairly large-scale
project, and the schedule required that we would start shooting
in Japan, then move to L.A., then move to New Zealand. We would be prepping
and shooting in all three places simultaneously because there
was no down time between locations. I was doing a lot of traveling
in prep, trying to keep up with it, and it became apparent to
me that I needed two different teams of electrical and grips
to stay on top of it. It wasn't just three different locations,
it was three different countries, so I thought it would be better
to have a key grip and gaffer from those regions prepping those
areas. I hired gaffer Randy Woodside and key grip Al La Verde
for L.A., and two Australians, gaffer Mick Morris and
key grip David Nichols, for New Zealand and Japan. I had worked with all of them on prior pictures
and knew I was in good hands. They had an enormous amount of
responsibility for pulling it all together when I was off in
other countries, and they did a great job of it. Mick and David
had done features in Japan, and their previous experience
working there proved very valuable.
For
the camera crew, I kept the same key members from L.A. all the way through the
picture: A-camera operator Mike Thomas, first ACs Chris Toll
[A camera] and Tommy Klines [B camera], and second AC Jeff Pelton.
The B-camera/Steadicam operator for Japan and L.A. was Greg Lundsgaard.
Camera operator Peter McCaffrey from Auckland did all of our B-camera/Steadicam work in New Zealand. In Japan and New Zealand, we filled out the crews
of all three departments - camera, electrical and grip - with
experienced people from those countries and Australia. For the battle scenes, we pulled extra camera
crews from L.A., New Zealand and Australia. All of our camera gear
came from Panavision in Woodland Hills, where Phil Radin and
his people did a great job of supporting us with the huge amount
of equipment we used.
Everywhere
we went, we were quite well staffed. It was a real mix of personalities
and languages, but it worked out well because everyone was very
enthusiastic about making the picture. We always had English-speaking
translators to help us in Japan, and after listening
to some of the key American personnel, it seemed like the Kiwis
and Australians believed we should have brought some translators
to New Zealand as well. [Laughs.] But
they were too polite to say anything about it.
What
was your strategy for maintaining lighting continuity on day
exteriors, given that so much of the action plays out in wide
shots?
Toll: I had never been to Japan before starting this
film, and somehow I had the idealized impression that the exterior
light there would be dramatically rich but soft and diffuse,
and that this should be the starting point for the look of the
film. Unfortunately, I saw very little of that kind of natural
light throughout the shoot, so we had to devise various ways
to create it. We had quite a bit of direct sunlight in most of
our exterior locations in all three countries.
In L.A., Lilly built a Tokyo street set on Warners' New York Street. I spent time on the
set while it was being laid out to get ideas about how to shoot
it. We shot there in November, which meant we had 10 hours of
daylight, sunrise to sunset. The set ran north to south and featured
a narrow street and large, open intersections. On a sunny day,
the quality and character of the sunlight, as well as the direction
and size of shadows, changed continuously during the course of
the day. A contrasty, sunlit look was something I was trying
to avoid, and even if I had wanted it, the circumstances of this
particular set created enormous lighting-continuity issues. The
scenes we were going to shoot there involved 200 to 300 extras,
and there was no way - or desire - to limit the scope of the
shots. So I began to think about using a large, overhead silk.
Al
La Verde began to investigate what it would take to put a silk
over the entire set. Our set stretched down the New York Street, which was over 800 feet long. We weren't
sure this would be possible but we wanted to give it a try. Al
and his rigger, Kent Baker, came up with an idea and took it
to the studio grip department. The studio, in turn, recommended
bringing in an outside rigging company because of the structural
issues involved in putting up a rig of that size. Kent contacted Paul and Craig
Ryan of Ver Sales, and their engineers recommended installing
separate steel poles to support the rig, because there were no
existing structures on site that would do it. It became a fairly
pricey proposition, so we modified the plan. The final design
was nearly 500 feet long. Al and Kent designed the silk to be
pulled out and back very quickly, and with a little practice
their crew was getting it out in 15 to 20 minutes. I call it
a 'silk,' but it was actually a diffusion material from Rosco
called Silent Light Grid, which was terrific. We were concerned
that the material might make noise and ruin dialogue if the wind
came up, but the Silent Light Grid is actually pretty silent;
we did have some windy conditions, and both the rig and the material
worked very well. The planning and installation of this rig was
a great demonstration of how film technicians can be masters
of innovation when faced with a challenge of this kind. Fortunately,
we were working in L.A. in a studio environment, and we had the talent,
resources and support to get the job done. I don't believe we
would have pulled it off somewhere else.
You
began shooting in New
Zealand during
its summer season. How did the long daylight hours affect your
work?
Toll: New Zealand is a very beautiful country,
but making the natural exterior light interesting throughout
the long summer days was particularly challenging. We had more
than 16 hours of daylight when we started the shoot, and at that
time of year, what you see from about 9
a.m. to 4 or 5
p.m. is the most uninteresting,
hard-contrast overhead sunlight you can imagine. We started shooting
in our village set, and based on what we had done in L.A., I was trying to figure
out how to use large overheads, but it was difficult because
of the terrain. The village had been built on a hilly plateau;
using poles wasn't possible, and using Condors or cranes was
impractical. In discussing it with Mick Morris and David Nichols,
I thought of the UFO, a device Randy Woodside had found in L.A. that we had used as a
lighting platform on another film. The UFO is a heavy, 100-foot
crane arm mounted on a very small truck chassis. It's an all-terrain
vehicle and is self-leveling, so you can get it into very odd
places and extend the arm to full length in an almost horizontal
configuration, even if the chassis isn't on level ground. That's
a fairly unique combination, and I tried to get the UFO for New Zealand, but it wasn't available
when we started working in the village. We did get it in time
for the battle sequences, but the village required a different
approach.
We
had planned on building both interior and exterior sets at the
location as a way to take advantage of weather and time of day
for lighting. Ed, Lilly and I had done this successfully when
we had last worked together. In addition to enabling us to shoot
better light, it allowed everyone to be much more flexible, and
we were able to shoot more material in a shorter amount of time
because we had the continuity of being in the same location for
an extended period. So Lilly and her team built Taka's house,
where Nathan is nursed back to health, as a practical interior.
We tried to schedule our interior scenes in the house in the
mornings and work outside in the afternoons, when the light was
friendlier. We started shooting there in January, which meant
we didn't lose the light until around 9:30 p.m., so this strategy
meant we would come to work at 10 a.m., shoot indoors until lunch,
and then work outdoors in the afternoons. This sounds like a
relatively simple idea, but it can get tricky because it wreaks
havoc on the normal type of shooting schedule. We were sometimes
breaking away from an unfinished interior scene to begin an exterior
scene, and then picking up the rest of the interior the following
day. Our first AD, Nilo Otero, tried to make this strategy work
as often as possible, but we couldn't use it every day. Shooting
that way puts quite a burden on the cast and crew, but everyone
was sympathetic to the idea. Ed was especially supportive because
he'd seen how it had worked on Legends.
For
the other day-exterior scenes, we just dealt with the light as
best we could. It took five weeks to shoot the final battle,
and we shot through all of our daylight hours to make that schedule.
We had a variety of weather conditions, and for the overall look
and for lighting continuity, I tried to shoot indirect light
as much as possible. By the time we filmed the battles, the UFO
had arrived, and we used it to hang an overhead 30-by-40-foot
frame covered in Silent Light Grid that Mick and Dave had built.
We used it on some of the more contained shots in the final battle
- 'contained' being a relative term. They weren't necessarily
small shots because there were often 100 to 200 people in them,
usually involved in swordfights. At times, we enlarged [the affected
area] by putting a 30-by-30-foot frame on stands at the end of
the UFO. The battlefield set was relatively level and grassy,
so we could essentially get a 40-by-60 overhead anywhere we needed
it. We had a period of mixed weather while we shot coverage on
the fights, and having the overhead helped enormously in trying
to match the light.
Page
2
|